Friday, January 14, 2011
One of the things I find interesting in the Decadent Debate is that idea that reviewers should not review books from presses they publish with. It is easily apparent that I don't follow this rule (Aspen Mountain Press, Cobblestone, Loose Id, Phaze; although I do now avoid reviewing the works of friends and acquaintances). So have I been behaving badly without even knowing it? Is the implicit blessing (non-objection) of the authors and publishers what makes it okay? Is it okay; is it not?